> Home > Academic Affairs > Faculty Site > Department Chair Handbook > Curriculum and Academic Programs
The
development of the curriculum and the academic programs of the
department/school constitutes an important responsibility of the
department chair/school dean. It is the responsibility of the chair/school dean to
provide leadership in the review and development of the department/school's curriculum and academic programs.
- Introduction of New
Courses
Requests
for the introduction of new courses are initiated by the
department/school and are submitted, in writing, to the college dean and the Academic Policy Committee (APC). The
college dean insures that the request is in proper form and
assists in an analysis of the resources necessary for the
course addition.
If
the APC approves a course proposal, it shall submit the
proposal to the faculty for approval.
Requests
for the approval of new courses must be submitted to the
APC prior to the date established in the Administrative
Calendar if the course is to be considered for
introduction in the upcoming academic year.
In
order to facilitate examination of new course proposals,
the following items should be included in the new course
proposals:
- Specific
recommendation concerning the course: example:
"The _________ department/school recommends to the
APC the approval of the course, (course number
and title), as a regular course in the __________
department/school curriculum."
- Catalog information: description of the course including
course number, title, units, prerequisites,
whether the course carries general education
credit, alternate year offering, and any other
information which should accompany the catalog
description.
- Expanded
course description: this section should state
course content and goals in narrative form,
course outline, or syllabus. Normally the
statement should make clear how the course fits
into the objectives of the department/school and mission
of the institution. If a general statement about
teaching methods and teaching materials can be
made regarding the proposed course, that should
also be included in this section.
- Place
in the curriculum.
- How does
this course relate to other department/school
offerings? Is it required or an option in
a major, minor, or supplemental
concentration?
- Is this
course similar in content to a course or
courses in another department/school? Does the
course impact other majors? If so, what
consultation occurred with that department/school?
- Does this
course represent an expansion of the
curriculum? Could another course be
dropped in order to avoid increasing the
number of courses? Can the course be
offered on alternate years?
- Whom will
this course serve? Which course
enrollments will decrease if this course
is introduced?
- Rationale
for proposing the course for the curriculum and,
if applicable, for the prerequisites and general
education credit status.
- Resource
allocation implications
- Does the
university have staff qualified to teach
the course?
- If it
does, would shifts in teaching
assignments to this course require any
additions (adjunct or full-time) to the
staff?
- If no
part-time or full-time additions to the
staff would be created directly or
indirectly by introducing the course,
what provisions are being made to
accommodate the course (e.g., course to
be dropped or offered less often)?
- What are
the enrollment prospects?
- When and
how often will the course be offered?
- What are
the budget implications of introducing
the course with respect to additional
equipment, supplies, facilities, library
resources, computer resources, materials,
etc?
- Background
information or additional notes (including the
action taken at the department/school meetings).
- Review of Department/School
Curriculum
Implicit
in the introduction of new courses is the assumption that
the course offerings of the department/school have been
carefully reviewed, for no rationale for the introduction
of new courses can be complete without an indication as
to how they fit into the existing course offerings.
Moreover, a formal review of the department/school's curriculum,
including the general education component, must be
included as a part of the department/school review which occurs
at least once every five years.
Each
department/school should periodically consider whether or not
certain courses should be deleted from the department/school's
curriculum. Courses not offered at least once every two
years will be dropped from the catalog by action of the APC.
In
summary, all course offerings, whether those proposed or
those already in the curriculum, must be part of a
carefully defined rationale for the department/school's
curriculum.
- Curricular Programs
- Department/School Majors
Each
department/school shall periodically examine the major
or majors offered by the department/school noting the
specific courses required, recommended or
required sequence of courses, recommended and
required cognate courses. All majors are
recommended and approved through the APC and then
to the faculty for approval. Any new majors or
changes to existing majors will also be submitted
to the college dean for review and recommendation.
- Department/School Minors
Departments/schools
have the option of sponsoring a thematic or
department minor as specified in the PLNU Catalog
and approved by the APC.
- Summer Sessions
Curriculum
The
summer sessions schedule is a part of the approved
academic calendar. In accordance with the dates published
in the Administrative Calendar, department chairs/school deans are
requested to determine their department/school members' interest
in teaching in the summer sessions. Faculty members in an
active doctoral program should be discouraged from
teaching summer sessions, and enrollments should be
carefully projected so that summer offerings do not
reduce fall and spring registrations below acceptable
limits. The final schedule of classes and staffing is to
be submitted to the college dean according to the published
dates.
|